Case Summary - 642 Words

Dawei Chen Case Summary- Confucius, Machiavelli, and Rousseau According to the Case context, we can find out many ideas about leadership. First, from the great Chinese ancient philosopher-Confucius that we can learn that a phenomenal leader needs to love people and use virtue to rule a society. The ultimate goal for a leader is to fulfill everyone’s demand. In order to achieve this goal; a leader must be a sage or at least a very wise man to set up a very extraordinary example for others to learn. However, this opinion has a very obvious flaw that people cannot be as good as he think and most people are selfish that this kind of leadership is not going to be successful. Second, From the Machiavelli, we can acquire the idea which†¦show more content†¦second, their leadership and opinions exhibit us a great culture diversity. In Eastern culture in particular in China because of the long history, there were lots of great leaders in their history; this situation es tablishes a social structure that people prefer to have a great sage such as Confucius to lead their lives rather than the social contract (law). Moreover, in this social structure, leaders need to be a very excellent man to lead the direction of social development, but sometimes it does not work very well because most leaders are flawed normal people. Compare this circumstance to the Western, most Western states does not have such long history this lead to a quite different situation. Even if there were lots of great leader people still prefer to set a conference to discuss the social problems. This idea could be dated from the ancient Grace. In recent period particularly in revolution era this idea spread very fast and filled into people very deeply. This shows us very obvious assertion that leaders need to use different strategies in different culture background. Third, leaders need to combine different skills to achieve a successful leadership. In human history, society are chan ging very fast, many ideologists and wise man once gave us the idea that what is leadership. In my eyes, a competent leadership is a combination ofShow MoreRelatedSummary Of Eveline And A Painful Case 1017 Words   |  5 PagesAuthorLastName2 Paralysis of the Main Characters in â€Å"Eveline† and â€Å"A Painful Case† The two characters in Dubliners short stories; Mr. Duffy and Eveline present strong feeling of paralysis throughout the excerpts. Mr. Duffy lives in Chapelzoid suburbs of Dublin, and he considers life of the city unpleasant and pretentious. He lives in dull old house which he ordinarily sits near the window where he can view the city from the distance. Walls of his home spring high and has uncarpeted floor with noRead MoreWirecutter Case Study Summary803 Words   |  4 PagesCase Studies That Prove Affiliate Marketing Is A Profitable Online Business {Amazon USA} Case Study 1: THEWIRECUTTER.COM CONTENT STRATEGY: The Wirecutters prosperity is clear once you read any of their audits. They do fun tests with items that are so great; they have a high shot of turning into a web sensation in each space. The Wirecutter has more than 11.4k alluding areas and is just about commanding Google for each best [product] look terms in the contraptions and electronic space. AdaptationRead MoreCase Summary Essay951 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Case 5 Summary Turnover and Morale Problems at TSA In the case of the TSA; Transportation Safety Administration, the problem is that screeners are facing declining morale with a high turnover rate. This means that low morale and high turnover become prevalent through the screeners who work at TSA. According to a recent government’s report, low morale issues can make negative impacts on the employees in organizations. It implies that the screeners at TSA can not only be distracted on their jobsRead MoreThe Case Lawsuit Filed Suit1014 Words   |  5 PagesNow through undersigned counsel, come Defendant, Lauris Hollis (Defendant), who respectfully request that this Court grant their Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing the Plaintiff s claims against him. Defendant move this Court for a Summary Judgment on the grounds that the Plaintiff has no cause of action, no right of action or no interest in the plaintiff to institute the suit and it should be dismissed. UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 1. The Plaintiff filed suit on April 7, 2015, in LivingstonRead MoreThe Rock Towers On Her Property1436 Words   |  6 Pages Like the defendant in Moore, Herrera is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law in this action, because she could not have known or realized that the rock towers on her property would pose an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury to Maria. Herrera’s private property is located in a remote location in Arizona where she allows adults to view her land art by appointment only. It is reasonably understandable that Herrera does not like uninvited or unwanted individuals on herRead MoreThe Work of the Magistrates Court and Magistrates Essays1370 Words   |  6 Pagesthey may have little or no legal knowledge as they will receive training before and after their appointment. Also a court clerk always sits with the bench to advise them on relevant aspects of the law. Three magistrates sit at each case and there is no jury. The three magistrates are referred to as the bench. One of these magistrates is called the chair and will always speak for the bench. The magistrates will hear issues on fact and law and then decide the final Read MoreThe Oliver Versus Brock Case1381 Words   |  6 Pagesindividual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan WhitfieldRead MoreFinal Code Test : A Case Against A Suspect Is Based On The Full Code1208 Words   |  5 Pagescode test from the CPS 2013 Code for Crown Prosecutors. The decision on whether or not to charge a case against a suspect is based on the Full code test. There are 2 stages for the test and the first stage is the evidential stage, being noted in the CPS 4.4, a case must pass the evidential stage in order to proc eed no matter the seriousness or how sensitive it may turn to be. With reference to the case scenario, we should see whether the evidence could be used in the court in order for prosecutionRead MoreThe Court Of Appeals Affirmed The Dismissal1573 Words   |  7 Pageslitigation proceeded. As noted in Attia and Oravec discussed supra, even when litigation proceeds in cases involving complex structures, the plaintiff is unlikely to survive a motion for summary judgment. B. WHAT DOES IT TAKE FOR THE PLAINTIFF TO SUCCEED? As seen, it is exceedingly difficult for a plaintiff to prove infringement unless the defendant copied the plans verbatim. Nevertheless, these cases suggest that it may be possible to infringe an architect’s copyright absent verbatim copying whenRead MoreNarrative Summary Of The Case 1751 Words   |  8 PagesI. NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF THE CASE A. Case Summary Mary has been married for the last 3 years with her new husband after the first marriage of 11 years broke up. She had been married before at age 18 when, she was young and immature and now she was 32 years with a daughter aged 12 years. Her first marriage had broken because of domestic violence and she thought her second marriage would work. Mary married Jeff, her second husband because she wanted security for her child, and Jeff was looking for